> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 3 +--
> drivers/ras/ras.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/ras.h | 15 +++++++++++--
> include/ras/ras_event.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> index 95540ea8dd9d..2a7f424d59b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> @@ -21,9 +21,51 @@ void log_non_standard_event(const guid_t *sec_type, const guid_t *fru_id,
> trace_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text, sev, err, len);
> }
>
> -void log_arm_hw_error(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err)
> +void log_arm_hw_error(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err, const u8 sev)
> {
What GIT tree is this patch based on? I don't see this log_arm_hw_error()
function in drivers/ras/ras.c upstream, or in intel-next.
Should ARM specific code like this be in a file with "arm" in its name? Or at least
be inside some #ifdef CONFIG_ARM.
-Tony
