On Wednesday, 12 of March 2008, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 10 March 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > + * @poweroff: Hibernation-specific, executed after saving a hibernation image. > > + * Quiesce the device, put it into a low power state appropriate for the > > + * upcoming system state (such as PCI_D3hot), and enable wakeup events as > > + * appropriate. > > This seems uncomfortably similar to device_driver.shutdown(). > The only obvious difference is wakeup event handling, and even > that is already a function of the target system state. > > Are both methods needed? > > Shouldn't this be more generic, not "hibernation-specific"? Well, let's not make restrictions at this point. There's nothing wrong with pointing both at the same function and if everyone turns out to do that, we'll remove one callback. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
