Now that we have a standard ACPI helper, we can use acpi_dev_uid_match()
for matching _UID as per the original logic before commit 2a036e489eb1
("ACPI: LPSS: Refactor _UID handling to use acpi_dev_uid_to_integer()"),
instead of treating it as an integer.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- Update commit message
drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index 875de44961bf..6aaa6b066510 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -167,10 +167,8 @@ static struct pwm_lookup byt_pwm_lookup[] = {
static void byt_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata)
{
- u64 uid;
-
/* Only call pwm_add_table for the first PWM controller */
- if (acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) || uid != 1)
+ if (!acpi_dev_uid_match(pdata->adev, "1"))
return;
pwm_add_table(byt_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(byt_pwm_lookup));
@@ -218,10 +216,8 @@ static struct pwm_lookup bsw_pwm_lookup[] = {
static void bsw_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata)
{
- u64 uid;
-
/* Only call pwm_add_table for the first PWM controller */
- if (acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) || uid != 1)
+ if (!acpi_dev_uid_match(pdata->adev, "1"))
return;
pwm_add_table(bsw_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(bsw_pwm_lookup));
base-commit: f9c7f9d537da013471e5c7913a33b6489bdeb3cf
--
2.17.1
