On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 10:09 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Harvey Harrison wrote: > > > >> __inline__ : 1380 > > > > Lots of them in include/asm-*...not sure if there is a reason for this. > > > > Preferred form for code that's exported to userspace (since gcc > complains with -ansi -pedantic otherwise.) > Figured it would be something like that. Would it be reasonable to move towards eliminating __inline? Also, since the exported headers already go through unifdef, could we move to using inline everywhere in the kernel and add a processing step to make it __inline__ in the exported headers? Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
