On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:57:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 09:26:41PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > > May I keep them inline?
> >
> > The problem with such manual inlines is that we force gcc to always
> > inline them - and history has shown that functions grow without the
> > "inline" being removed.
>
> what do you mean by "we force gcc to always inline them"?
#define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> gcc is free to decide whether to inline or to not inline.
Not with __attribute__((always_inline)).
> (and CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING got removed from 2.6.25)
CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING never had any effect.
> Ingo
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
