On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 12:35 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > The inclusion of linux/arm-smccc.h in acpi_ffh is unnecessary and can > be even termed wrong. It is needed in the arm64 architecture callback > implementation and probably is the leftover from the missed cleanup of > the initial implementation. > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_ffh.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ffh.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ffh.c > index 19aff808bbb8..8d5126963dc7 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ffh.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ffh.c > @@ -9,8 +9,6 @@ > #include <linux/idr.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > > -#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> > - > static struct acpi_ffh_info ffh_ctx; > > int __weak acpi_ffh_address_space_arch_setup(void *handler_ctxt, > -- Applied as 6.5 material, thanks!
