On 19.03.23 08:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 22.02.23 08:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?) >> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by >> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 : > > An issue that looked like a network bug was now bisected and it turns > out it's cause by 5c62d5aab875 ("ACPICA: Events: Support fixed PCIe wake > event") which Huacai Chen provided. Could you take a look at the ticket > linked above? Jianmin did get close to a proper fix a while ago (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c46 ), but it appears there wasn't any progress to fix this during the last week. Or did I miss it? This is kinda unsatisfying, as the culprit is now known for nearly four weeks; especially as this is a issue that is present in 6.2 since it was released and would have been possible to fix there and in mainline with a simple revert. We even got close to one two weeks ago already (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c49 ). #sigh I'd say we should revert this. Rafael, what's your opinion here? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot poke
