On 2023/3/25 下午9:31, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 24.03.23 11:09, Jianmin Lv wrote:
Please try the following patch:
https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/784/commits/0e66e6aae972dac3833bdcbd223aa6a8b1733176
To interact with the reporters, please comment here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069
Sorry, I wish it was different, but I can't CC the reporters here
without their permission, because bugzilla.kernel.org tells users upon
registration their "email address will never be displayed to logged out
users".
FWIW, I forwarded your request yesterday and one reporter commented that
it didn't help. But having me as a man-in-the-middle is not a good idea.
Ok, I has transformed and adjusted the patch from ACPICA and post it
into https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069.
Thanks!
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
On 2023/3/24 下午5:50, Huacai Chen wrote:
Hi, Thorsten,
I'm sorry I ignored this email, and Jianmin, could you please
investigate this problem? Thank you.
Huacai
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:46 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19.03.23 08:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
On 22.02.23 08:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
mail. Quoting from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 :
An issue that looked like a network bug was now bisected and it turns
out it's cause by 5c62d5aab875 ("ACPICA: Events: Support fixed PCIe
wake
event") which Huacai Chen provided. Could you take a look at the ticket
linked above?
Huacai Chen, did you look into this? Would be good to have this
regression fixed rather sooner than later, as it seems to annoy quite a
few people.
Should we maybe simply revert the problematic change for now and reapply
it later once the root-issue was found and fixed?
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
#regzbot poke
FWIW, the whole story started like this:
Ivan Ivanich 2023-02-22 00:51:52 UTC
After upgrade to 6.2 having issues with wake on lan on 2 systems: -
first is an old lenovo laptop from 2012(Ivy Bridge) with realtek
network adapter - second is a PC(Haswell refresh) with PCIE realtek
network adapter
Both uses r8169 driver for network.
On laptop it's not possible to wake on lan after poweroff On PC it's
not possible to wake on lan up after hibernate but works after
poweroff
In both cases downgrade to 6.1.x kernel fixes the issue.
Meanwhile a few others that ran into the same problem with NICs from
different vendors joined the ticket
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker'
hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
