On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:21 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Make fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint() consistent with the rest of > for_each_*() definitions in the file, i.e. use the form of > > for (iter = func(NULL); iter; \ > iter = func(iter)) > > as it's done in all the rest of the similar macro definitions. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> and I think that you need to resend it and CC Greg (who picks up device property patches nowadays). > --- > include/linux/property.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h > index 37179e3abad5..f090419818a2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/property.h > +++ b/include/linux/property.h > @@ -436,9 +436,9 @@ fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > unsigned int fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_count(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > unsigned long flags); > > -#define fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, child) \ > - for (child = NULL; \ > - (child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, child)); ) > +#define fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, child) \ > + for (child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, NULL); child; \ > + child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, child)) > > int fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint); > --