Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:38 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:27 PM Raul Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:19 PM Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ACPI IRQ/Interrupt resources contain a bit that describes if the
> > > > interrupt should wake the system. This change exposes that bit via
> > > > a new IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE flag. Drivers should check this flag
> > >
> > > I would call this IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKE which is (a) simpler and easier
> > > to read and (b) it sort of matches the "wakeirq" naming convention.
> >
> > It was Dmitry who originally suggested the name. I personally like the
> > CAPABLE in the name. It makes it clear that it's capable of acting as
> > a wake source, not to be confused with being enabled as a wake source.
>
> Well, so be it then.
>
> As I said elsewhere, I can apply this patch too if that's useful at this point.
>

We just need to make sure the ACPI patches 5-8 land before the i2c
patches 9-13. The i2c patches 1-4 can land before or after the ACPI
changes. I'm not sure how things get coordinated across subsystems.

> > >
> > > This is not a big deal if you insist on this name and for a good
> > > reason, but just something I would do differently.
> > >
> > > The patch LGTM otherwise.
> > >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux