On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:12 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:17:11PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:05 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 6:41 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > In case we have an ACPI driver, check its ID table for matching, > > > > This allows to use some generic device property APIs in such > > > > drivers. > > > > > > No new provisions for ACPI drivers, please. > > > > OK! I will think about how to refactor a driver in question, so it > > won't need this kind of trick. Meanwhile patches 1-3 can be applied > > independently, if you have no objections. > > I see that you applied an equivalent patch to what I had here as patch 3. > Taking into account rejection of patches 4 and 5 I will send a v2 with > patch 1 and (modified due to drop of the 5) 2 for your convenience. Appreciated, thanks!
