On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:43:00PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > In the first RFC series I sent on the 24 June, I explicitly asked the > following questions: (...) > I even stated: "Please look at the patches and make suggestions on how > we can proceed to clean up this quirk of DSA." and made no mention of > wanting something explicitly from Andrew. > > Yet, none of those questions were answered. > > So no, Jakub's comments are *not* misdirected at all. Go back and read > my June 24th RFC series yourself: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YrWi5oBFn7vR15BH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I don't believe I need to justify myself any further for why I didn't leave a comment on any certain day. I left my comments when I believed it was most appropriate for me to intervene (as someone who isn't really affected in any way by the changes, except for generally maintaining what's in net/dsa/, and wanting to keep a clean framework structure). Also, to repeat myself, blaming me for leaving comments, but doing so late, is not really fair. I could have not responded at all, and I wouldn't be having this unpleasant discussion. It begs the question whether you're willing to be held accountable in the same way for the dates on which you respond on RFC patches. > I've *tried* my best to be kind and collaborative, but I've been > ignored. Now I'm hacked off. This could have been avoided by responding > to my explicit questions sooner, rather than at the -rc6/-rc7 stage of > the show. I think you should continue to try your best to be kind and collaborative, you weren't provoked or intentionally ignored in any way, and it isn't doing these patches any good.
