Hi Russell, On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:00:59PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > Hi, > > This is a re-hash of the previous RFC series, this time using the > suggestion from Vladimir to create a swnode based fixed-link > specifier. > > Most of the changes are to DSA and phylink code from the previous > series. I've tested on my Clearfog (which has just one Marvell DSA > switch) and it works there - also tested without the fixed-link > specified in DT. I had some comments I wanted to leave on the previous RFC patch set (which in turn is essentially identical to this one, hence they still apply), but I held off because I thought you were waiting for some feedback from Andrew. Has something changed? I'm going to leave my comments anyway now.
