> -----Original Message----- > From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Sent: 17 May 2022 08:18 > To: 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>; Robin Murphy > <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>; > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; > will@xxxxxxxxxx; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>; > steven.price@xxxxxxx; Sami.Mujawar@xxxxxxx; jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx; laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx; hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx] > > Sent: 13 May 2022 10:50 > > To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; > > joro@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > will@xxxxxxxxxx; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > steven.price@xxxxxxx; Sami.Mujawar@xxxxxxx; jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx; laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx; hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > > > [with Christoph's correct email address] > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2022-05-10 08:23, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > > > Hi Joerg/Robin, > > > > > > > > I think this series is now ready to be merged. Could you please let > > > > me know if there is anything missing. > > > > > > Fine by me - these patches have had enough review and testing now that > > > even if anything else did come up, I think it would be better done as > > > follow-up work on the merged code. > > > > Given the ACPICA dependency I believe it is best for this series > > to go via the ACPI tree, right ? > > > > I assume there are all the required ACKs for that to happen. > > The SMMUv3/SMMU related changes (patches 6 - 9) still doesn't have > explicit ACK from maintainers other than the go ahead above from Robin. > > Just thought of highlighting it as not sure that will be an issue or not. > All, Just a gentle ping on this series again. Any chance this can make into 5.19? Please consider. Thanks, Shameer
