On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:02 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:29:05PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > > Rename the field to make it more clear, that the device can execute DMA > > attacks on the system, and thus the system may need protection from > > such attacks from this device. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v4: Initial version, created based on comments on other patch > > What a horrible name. Why not untrusted_dma which captures the > intent much better? FWIW, I like this one much better too.
