On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:29:05PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > Rename the field to make it more clear, that the device can execute DMA > attacks on the system, and thus the system may need protection from > such attacks from this device. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v4: Initial version, created based on comments on other patch What a horrible name. Why not untrusted_dma which captures the intent much better?
