On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:45:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > since we will no longer has a dev->fwnode pointer anymore. Do you > > suggest to keep that pointer but convert the "secondary" to a linked > > list instead? > > Yes, please. Sounds good. I think that would simplify the changes of the existing interfaces even though only to mantain one fwnode_head would be a bit cleaner. Though, that cleanup could always be on top later if needed.
