On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:14:34PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:21:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 05:33:20PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 01:20:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:07:51PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > + guid_t *image_type_id = &img_hdr->image_type_id;
> > > >
> > > > efi_guid_t ?
> > > >
> > > efi_guid_t is a 32-bit aligned guid_t, which is for the case when
> > > efi_guid_t* arguments are 32-bit aligned. And it is for 32-bit ARM.
> > > Since this code injection is only for 64-bit, the guid is not required
> > > to be strictly 32-bit aligned I suppose?
> >
> > But the type of that member may not be guid_t. So, I expect not to see guid_t
> > at all here or as a internal member with the export/import GUID API in place.
> >
> > See, for example
> > d1c6e08e7503 ("libnvdimm/labels: Add uuid helpers")
> >
> 8b03aa0e0e5a ("libnvdimm/labels: Add type-guid helpers") I suppose. Do you
> mean, since the label is not delcared as uuid type, then need to treat the
> data region as a uuid. But it is actually not a formal 'uuid' type, so uuid_t
> is not applicable here. And this also applys to the case in this patch?
> > ...
> >
> > > > > + ret = guid_parse(PFRU_UUID, &pfru_dev->uuid);
> >
> > > > > + ret = guid_parse(PFRU_CODE_INJ_UUID, &pfru_dev->code_uuid);
> >
> > > > > + ret = guid_parse(PFRU_DRV_UPDATE_UUID, &pfru_dev->drv_uuid);
> >
> > > > Why do you need to keep zillions of copies of the data which seems
> > > > is not going to be changed? Three global variables should be enough,
> > > > no?
> > > >
> > > The guid information is embedded in each pfru_dev and only calculated
> > > once during probe. I thought people try to avoid using global variables
> > > if possible?
> >
> > Use your common sense. You might have a lot of data duplication,
> > and this data is definitely not something that needs any kind of
> > serialization / personification / etc.
> >
> Ok, I'll switch to global variables in next version.
Wait, no, why? Keep them per-device unless you can somehow be
guaranteed there will never be more than one of these ACPI devices in a
system. It's simpler this way, no need to worry about global state at
all.
thanks,
greg k-h
