On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote: > > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between acpi and > > the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code > > to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machine, but i might be > > wrong on the details since acpi is such a big code chunk to swallow. > > I don't see any obvious conflict from the log you posted. For the sake > of comparison, can you post the corresponding dmesg log after you removed > the patch? The only difference i see is that ACPI finds EC in DSDT in the working kernel and in the broken case something silently fails. Please find attached the 2 bootlogs and a disassembled DSDT. -- Regards/Gruß, Boris.
BZh91AY&SYµÜ¬t $Øÿ¬ý´