On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote: > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between acpi and > the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code > to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machine, but i might be > wrong on the details since acpi is such a big code chunk to swallow. I don't see any obvious conflict from the log you posted. For the sake of comparison, can you post the corresponding dmesg log after you removed the patch? acpi_thermal_get_temperature() only evaluates _TMP, which isn't very interesting. I wonder if there's some conflict between that AML method and the EC driver or something. If you can also collect the DSDT, maybe I can poke around in there and see what _TMP is really doing. Thanks, Bjorn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
