Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
handle explicitly. There doesn't seem to be any status enum value
defined that makes more sense than 'unknown' for a battery at a
critical charge level.
Maybe one should be added?
There is already "Critical" field for capacity.
Ah, that's ok, then.
It seems that the state should be limited to only 3 options:
charging, discharging, and not charging.
I'd call "not charging", "idle" instead. After all, discharging IS not
charging as well...
There is power_supply interface, and authors already declared this "not charging"
state, also they already failed to invent "idle".
So, you might send them patch, renaming "not charging" to "idle"...
Regards,
Alex.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
