On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: >>>> handle explicitly. There doesn't seem to be any status enum value >>>> defined that makes more sense than 'unknown' for a battery at a >>>> critical charge level. >> >> Maybe one should be added? >> > There is already "Critical" field for capacity. Ah, that's ok, then. > It seems that the state should be limited to only 3 options: > charging, discharging, and not charging. I'd call "not charging", "idle" instead. After all, discharging IS not charging as well... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
