Re: [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:53:33AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Maybe just letting both events in is the best idea.  It's not like two
> duplicate events are gonna break anything and I don't think many vendors
> are gonna implement separate mechanism when the default SATA phy based
> one works.

Works for me. Unrelatedly, is it expected that the EH take some time 
attempting to revalidate the port before finally deciding that the drive 
has gone? I seem to lose 15 seconds or so to that, which is more 
irritating on PATA systems where it tends to block the channel.

(Quite why HP put their hotswap optical drives on the same PATA channel 
as the internal drive is somewhat beyond me, but...)
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux