On 09/04/2007 05:43 PM, Len Brown wrote: > On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> A look at the 'cpuidle' branch of git-acpi shows a commit >> e40cede7d63a029e92712a3fe02faee60cc38fb4, "cpuidle: first >> round of documentation updates" that doesn't show up in that >> branch online. The entire Documentation/cpuidle directory >> is missing from the tree when looking at the web pages, and >> it's missing from git-acpi.patch in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 (but the >> patch shows up in the summary information in the patch >> header.) Where did it go? And how can -mm be used to test >> things if its patches don't even match their own headers? > > A later patch in that series, "cpuidle: re-write", reverted > the documentation from the intermediate patch that you refer to: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2305a5920fb8ee6ccec1c62ade05aa8351091d71 It never occurred to me that a patch would just remove documentation. Thanks for looking into that... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
