On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > A look at the 'cpuidle' branch of git-acpi shows a commit > e40cede7d63a029e92712a3fe02faee60cc38fb4, "cpuidle: first > round of documentation updates" that doesn't show up in that > branch online. The entire Documentation/cpuidle directory > is missing from the tree when looking at the web pages, and > it's missing from git-acpi.patch in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 (but the > patch shows up in the summary information in the patch > header.) Where did it go? And how can -mm be used to test > things if its patches don't even match their own headers? A later patch in that series, "cpuidle: re-write", reverted the documentation from the intermediate patch that you refer to: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2305a5920fb8ee6ccec1c62ade05aa8351091d71 The cpuidle branch on git.kernel.org looks okay to me: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=cpuidle the top commit is this one: commit 8975059a2c1e56cfe83d1bcf031bcf4cb39be743 Author: Adam Belay <abelay@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Aug 21 18:27:07 2007 -0400 CPUIDLE: load ACPI properly when CPUIDLE is disabled And this top patch is indeed included in the latest acpi test branch, as well as the latest ACPI test patch here: http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/test/2.6.23/acpi-test-20070126-2.6.23-rc5.diff.gz Note that there were some merge conflicts when pulling cpuidle into 2.6.23, so you are best off running either the acpi patch above on top of 2.6.23-rc5, or the acpi test branch, or the mm tree so you won't have to merge the cpuidle branch onto your latest kernel again. cheers, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
