On Thu, 09 Aug 2007, Nico Golde wrote: > But even checking for an empty directory is not enough since > there comes ibm-acpi (maybe others). As far as ibm-acpi goes, you can do me a BIG favour, and pretend it has nothing in procfs. > With working fan and usage of ibm-acpi you also get an empty > /proc/acpi/fan dir because you have /proc/acpi/ibm/fan where > you can then find the relevant files. > This sucks, I mean I can implement a workaround for this, > but if asus-acpi would do the same and maybe others would > exists I have to check alot of directories. So why not using > the existing directory structure? [...] > Why is ibm-acpi not using the existing directory structure > (also wrote to the ibm-acpi guys but with no answer so far, > so I try to get answers here)? Do I miss anything? I did reply to you. Hmm... I will resend the reply just in case, I have no idea why it didn't reach you. I didn't expand a lot on this email because I replied in detail to you on the email you didn't receive. I will resend it to this thread as well. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
