On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:39:57 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 23 July 2007 04:08:52 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:27:57 -0600 > > helgaas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > Run PNP files through Lindent. These patches are all completely > > > independent and contain no functional changes. Object files before > > > and after are identical. > > > > > > These are against current upstream. If you prefer a different base > > > or drop some of these due to conflicts with things already in -mm, > > > let me know and I can regenerate them. > > > > > > > eep, this is the worst time for me to merge this stuff: I get to carry > > large diffs against lots of files for two months. > > > > The best time to do this would be late(ish) in the 2.6.24 merge window. > > > > Can we do it then? > > Sure. I never know what the right time is. Would that be after 2.6.23 > has come out, your big bunch-o-patches has gone to Linus, and shortly > before 2.6.24-rc1? > Yes, that works. I was carrying a Lindent-UFS patch for a month and it broke regularly. But it was trivial to fix: I'd just rerun `Lindent fs/ufs/*.c' to regenerate it. Then reapply the manual-post-lindent-fixups patch on top of that, and fix any remaining rejects. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
