On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 14:01 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:45 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Thanks for including the demo program, Rui, it works for me (tm). > > > > Applied -- with the incremental patch below, which I think > > is correct because the only caller is bus.c, which is part of > > the base kernel, not a module. > Are you open to reworking this on top of my multicast patches that I > hope to get in soonish, or should I respin my multicast patches to > ensure ACPI has a stable family and multicast group number? > Hi, Johannes, I missed the discussion about the multicast issues. You don't need to reserve a family and group ID for ACPI. I'll rework this on your patches.:) But I don't know when these mutlicast patches can be merged while I hope the function of exporting ACPI event via genetlink can be added ASAP. I'm okay to hold off on this patch if you think the multicast patches can be merged soon. Or else I tend to apply it first and send an additional patch together with your patches later. Thanks, Rui - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
