On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:45 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > Thanks for including the demo program, Rui, it works for me (tm). > > Applied -- with the incremental patch below, which I think > is correct because the only caller is bus.c, which is part of > the base kernel, not a module. Dang, mail crossing :) Are you open to reworking this on top of my multicast patches that I hope to get in soonish, or should I respin my multicast patches to ensure ACPI has a stable family and multicast group number? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
