On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:52:33AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> +static void cpuidle_state_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> + /* Nothing required to do here, just workaround kobject warning*/
> +}
NO!!!
Do people think that I add warnings to the kernel so that people can
just work around them by passing empty functions to the driver core?
Sometimes I wonder why I even try...
Please fix this code, it is wrong.
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
