On Tue 20. Mar - 17:07:07, Holger Macht wrote: > On Mon 19. Mar - 11:11:09, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:46 +0100 > > Holger Macht <hmacht@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Sure. What actually bothers me is that in its current state, the dock > > > station driver signals 'green' on the dock station as soon as the user > > > presses the hardware undock button, but regardlessly of anything else. I > > > think it would be ok to let the ACPI undock event up to userspace because > > > in many situations it knows best when it is save to undock. > > > > I disagree - as I mentioned, not all laptops actually let you (userspace) > > control the undock process because they don't lock. The dock driver > > does notify user space of an undock, before it actually undocks: > > Yes, I know that, but userspace won't have enough time to interact with > the user in this case. I just imagine having an external disk connected to > the usb port of the docking station. In the moment the user undocks, his > unsynced or unwritten data is lost because the usb port gets > disconnected. The user needs the knowledge to actually "save remove" the > external disk before he undocks. You are right, this won't help in case > the dock station has no indication when it is "safe" to undock. This mail was accidentially sent a little bit too early ;-) What I wanted to add is just that with letting it up to userspace, it would also work in all cases, with or without lock, it would just give userspace more possibilities and might be more convenient for those systems where the dock station locks the machine. But I clearly see the advantage of not needing a userspace helper and for getting this docking thing to work in 99% of all cases ;-) Regards, Holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
