On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0300 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Please look at the patch I just sent. It allows ibm-acpi to load if > > ACPI_BAY is loaded. It will, of course, cause ACPI_BAY to refuse to load if > > ibm-acpi is already loaded, but that's probably fine as ACPI_BAY has just a > > single function. > > The patch you sent seems fine - however, the bay driver will need a patch > to correctly refuse to load when ibm_acpi is loaded and handling the bay. > I'm testing this out now - will check it with your patch. Will it? On 2.6.20 (I backported it) it bangs out with an error and refuses to load just fine... The only reason that's not quite acceptable in ibm-acpi is because ibm-acpi can do a lot more than just handle bay devices. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
