Hi! > > > > > This patch set is against acpi-test sysfs branch which already converts > > > > > ACPI to follow driver model. Now the ACPI procfs functions are > > > > > duplicated in sysfs step by step. And I want the ACPI interface in sysfs > > > > > works exactly the same way as in procfs. > > > > > > > > No, you can't port same broken interface into sysfs. Some /proc > > > > interfaces are horrible, and we do not want to create _exactly same_ > > > > horrible interfaces in /sys. > > > > > > Please be specific. > > > > /proc/acpi/alarm is horrible mess, as was detailed in another email > > ditto /proc/acpi/wakeup, and all those empty /proc/acpi directories Agreed, /proc/acpi/wakeup is unusable/strange/mess, too. I don't get that many empty /proc/acpi directories, but I surely hope I'll not see them in /sys. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
