Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/6] [-mm]: ACPI: duplicate ACPI procfs functions in sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 25 January 2007 4:08 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2007-01-24 21:28:13, Len Brown wrote:
> > On Monday 08 January 2007 08:13, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > This patch set is against acpi-test sysfs branch which already converts
> > > > ACPI to follow driver model. Now the ACPI procfs functions are
> > > > duplicated in sysfs step by step. And I want the ACPI interface in sysfs
> > > > works exactly the same way as in procfs.
> > > 
> > > No, you can't port same broken interface into sysfs. Some /proc
> > > interfaces are horrible, and we do not want to create _exactly same_
> > > horrible interfaces in /sys.
> > 
> > Please be specific.
> 
> /proc/acpi/alarm is horrible mess, as was detailed in another email

ditto /proc/acpi/wakeup, and all those empty /proc/acpi directories 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux