On Thursday 25 January 2007 4:08 am, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2007-01-24 21:28:13, Len Brown wrote: > > On Monday 08 January 2007 08:13, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > This patch set is against acpi-test sysfs branch which already converts > > > > ACPI to follow driver model. Now the ACPI procfs functions are > > > > duplicated in sysfs step by step. And I want the ACPI interface in sysfs > > > > works exactly the same way as in procfs. > > > > > > No, you can't port same broken interface into sysfs. Some /proc > > > interfaces are horrible, and we do not want to create _exactly same_ > > > horrible interfaces in /sys. > > > > Please be specific. > > /proc/acpi/alarm is horrible mess, as was detailed in another email ditto /proc/acpi/wakeup, and all those empty /proc/acpi directories - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
