On 8/23/06, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > that patch was an incremental depending on the previous patch. > Please send just the final patch vs 2.6.18-rc4 to the above, also cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Also, Dmitry had asked what we should do about handing ACPI errors to > > upper layers here: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=115392091425952&w=2 > > Dmitry has a good question and we need to iron it out for the general case. > I recommend that for your driver you simply do something like this for now: > > if (ACPI_ERROR(status)) > status = -EINVAL > > and get your driver into the mm tree to find the next problem. > Jaya, If you could make the change Len was talking about and create a patch against mainline I would apply it to my tree. Thank you. -- Dmitry
Ok. Will do and post shortly. Thanks, jaya - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
