Re: [PATCH 0/22] acpi4asus sync with 0.31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Karol and Julien are listed as the MAINTAINERS for asus_acpi.
Why do I not see their Signed-off-by or Acked-by lines on this patch series?

On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:02, Corentin CHARY wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 08:42, Len Brown a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:17, Corentin CHARY wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > This set of patch is against 2.6.19. It add support for many
> > > models, /sys/class/backlight/, Light Sens, etc ... There is also a lot of
> > > cleanups. And the most important, a new system to handle unsupported
> > > models.
> > >
> > > Patch from 0 to 10 are change and cleanups in the driver.
> > > Patch from 11t to 21 add support for new models.
> > >
> > > All the following patchs are available here :
> > > <http://xf.iksaif.net/acpi4asus/2.6.19/>
> >

> >
> > When this series is formatted to apply, what tree is it supposed to apply
> > to?
> These patchs are done with asus_acpi.c from 2.6.19 . So it can be applied to 
> 2.6.19 and 2.6.20-rc1 (as there is no change for asus_acpi in 2.6.20-rc1).
> 
> 
> >
> > How does it relate to the two asus_acpi patches in the mm tree right now --
> > 13/19 and 19/19 that akpm forwarded to the list yesterday.
> >
> The change in the mm tree are :   
> 	- Backlight support
> 	=> It's nearly the same code (patch 10/22)
> 	- no more useless cast
> 	=> It's ok (patch 7/22)
> 	- Add support for A6VA, M6V, W5F, V6V, A4S
> 	=> It's ok, but more features are supported in my patchs.
> 	And the implemention is cleaner, as I use my parse_method()
> 	function instead of adding special case in get_lcd_status()
> 	(see patch 5/22 and 6/22)
> 	- Swap W5A and W3V
> 	=> It's ok,  (patch 19/22)
> 	- Invert wled status
> 	=> I don't do it, as it's a mistake. I tested on A6T, A6J, F3JM, and the
> 	wled value don't need to be inverted.

So should we NAK the two patches that are proposed in -mm
and ask Andrew to not accept asus_acpi patches and instead direct
them to acpi4asus-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

> > How does it relate to the acpi-test tree, which already includes
> > the backlight patch to asus_acpi from Holger Macht?
> The change in the acpi-test tree are :
> 	- Backlight support
> 	=> done
> 	- no more useless cast
> 	=> done

Holger's patch is already queued for upstream -- having lived in -mm for some time now.
When you resend the acpi4asus series such that it is properly formatted,
please be sure it applies cleanly to what is in acpi release tree.
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.6.20/acpi-release-20060707-2.6.20-rc1.diff.gz)

thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux