Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 08:42, Len Brown a écrit : > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:17, Corentin CHARY wrote: > > Hi, > > This set of patch is against 2.6.19. It add support for many > > models, /sys/class/backlight/, Light Sens, etc ... There is also a lot of > > cleanups. And the most important, a new system to handle unsupported > > models. > > > > Patch from 0 to 10 are change and cleanups in the driver. > > Patch from 11t to 21 add support for new models. > > > > All the following patchs are available here : > > <http://xf.iksaif.net/acpi4asus/2.6.19/> > > Great! > > When this series is formatted to apply, what tree is it supposed to apply > to? These patchs are done with asus_acpi.c from 2.6.19 . So it can be applied to 2.6.19 and 2.6.20-rc1 (as there is no change for asus_acpi in 2.6.20-rc1). > > How does it relate to the two asus_acpi patches in the mm tree right now -- > 13/19 and 19/19 that akpm forwarded to the list yesterday. > The change in the mm tree are : - Backlight support => It's nearly the same code (patch 10/22) - no more useless cast => It's ok (patch 7/22) - Add support for A6VA, M6V, W5F, V6V, A4S => It's ok, but more features are supported in my patchs. And the implemention is cleaner, as I use my parse_method() function instead of adding special case in get_lcd_status() (see patch 5/22 and 6/22) - Swap W5A and W3V => It's ok, (patch 19/22) - Invert wled status => I don't do it, as it's a mistake. I tested on A6T, A6J, F3JM, and the wled value don't need to be inverted. > How does it relate to the acpi-test tree, which already includes > the backlight patch to asus_acpi from Holger Macht? The change in the acpi-test tree are : - Backlight support => done - no more useless cast => done > > thanks > -Len -- CHARY 'Iksaif' Corentin http://xf.iksaif.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
