Re: Possible bug in ACPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew,

Full description was sent to you and linux-acpi mail-list. I received copy from mail-list, so if you didn't, you can browse linux-acpi archive of Dec 4.
Also patch in #5534 was updated with the full description.
If you know, why my mails don't reach you, please advise...

Thanks,
   Alex.

Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:36:04 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Would it be better to replace sys_sched_yield() with cond_resched()?

I don't know, because I don't understand the dynamics of the proposed
change at all.

Again:

- How does it relate to http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/8/336

- Can we please have a *full* description of the problem and of the proposed
  solution?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux