On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:00:45PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Writing new utility from scratch took half a day, while porting ACPICA > acpidump with change in license would take weeks. > It does include ACPICA types, so it will require ACPICA headers at least. > Also it relies on ACPICA subset of libc, so it will be pain to both > maintain it and make any improvements. > We already tried to have acpidump utility in both ACPICA and pmtools and > ended with two completely different programs. > I don't get it. ducrot@neptune:~/packages$ cp -r acpica-unix-20060912/tools/acpixtract/ . ducrot@neptune:~/packages$ cd acpixtract/ ducrot@neptune:~/packages/acpixtract$ make cc -Wall -O2 -D_LINUX -DACPI_APPLICATION -Wstrict-prototypes -I../../include -c -o acpixtract.o acpixtract.c cc acpixtract.o -o acpixtract ducrot@neptune:~/packages/acpixtract$ How acpixtract need ACPICA specific headers? -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
