Please take a look at 7466, they seem to fight same problem, so may be
removing same patch will work...
And Linus is about to drop it anyway...
Regards,
Alex.
David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 10:22 pm, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER, acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
}
acpi_enable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe_bit, ACPI_ISR);
- return status == AE_OK ?
- ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
+ WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status));
+ return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
}
Strange ... applying this on top of the previous patch seems to work
much better, but that WARN_ON hasn't triggered. At least, not yet.
Updating to RC6, with your two patches installed...
ACPI Exception (evregion-0424): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20060707]
ACPI Exception (dswexec-0458): AE_TIME, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] [2006070
7]
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node ffff810002032d10), AE
_TIME
OK, I don't get the WARN_ON when these happen, so it's got to be one of the
other EC updates.
It'd be nice if this were easily reproducible ...
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
