Re: how I know if a interrupt is ioapic_edge_type or ioapic_level_type? [Was Re: [Fwd: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Fwd: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 - USB issues]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris,

If you keep me posted on the patch when released (I'm not on the kernel list, too high volume for me) I'll be happy to give your patch a whirl on my test box against whichever kernel you patch.

Your last point is real good, how DOES Windows figure it out? In saying that, without the VIA drivers I only have USB1.1 support on this motherboard... Again, happy to test some theories if you have some tests you'd like ran...

Cheers,

:)Johny

Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:

yap, in my opinion this function should back to

+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);


this is *obviousyl* wrong, it should never have been merged like that
and there are reports and complaints this causes problems for some
people

we should first attempt to get all the IDs (some are clearly missing
still, patch coming up to address that) and where that fails perhaps
have a kernel command-line parameter to be overly aggressive as a
stop-gap until we van figure out the proper solution

i'd also like to figure out why the quirk is needed/fails when people
are using ACPI for interrupt routing as presumbly that must work as
windows relies on it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux