Hi Ueimor, At Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:26:33 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > > akpm@xxxxxxxx <akpm@xxxxxxxx> : > > > > From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently wakeup capability is available if and only if > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y. But S5 is not a sleep state. This patch makes ACPI > > subsystem to be able to wakeup from S5 state even if sleep mode is not > > supported. > [...] > > diff -puN drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile~acpi-ia64-wake-on-lan-fix drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile > > --- devel/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile~acpi-ia64-wake-on-lan-fix 2006-03-28 14:03:06.000000000 -0800 > > +++ devel-akpm/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile 2006-03-28 14:03:06.000000000 -0800 > > @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ > > -obj-y := poweroff.o wakeup.o > > +obj-y := poweroff.o wakeup.o proc.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += main.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS) += proc.o > > $ less drivers/acpi/Kconfig > [...] > config ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP > bool "/proc/acpi/sleep (deprecated)" > depends on ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS > > The current patch would always build in a deprecated feature, right ? No. proc.c is always compiled, but the code relevant to /proc/acpi/sleep is not always built in. If ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP is not defined, that code snip is not compiled because of #ifdef guard on proc.c. On i386 system, you can select y/n of ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP. On ia64 system, ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP is not defined because ACPI_SLEEP (and ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS) is always `n'. Thanks, Satoru Takeuchi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
