Hi, Greg
On 2019/8/30 下午10:54, zhangfei wrote:
On 2019/8/28 下午11:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:27:56PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
+struct uacce {
+ const char *drv_name;
+ const char *algs;
+ const char *api_ver;
+ unsigned int flags;
+ unsigned long qf_pg_start[UACCE_QFRT_MAX];
+ struct uacce_ops *ops;
+ struct device *pdev;
+ bool is_vf;
+ u32 dev_id;
+ struct cdev cdev;
+ struct device dev;
+ void *priv;
+ atomic_t state;
+ int prot;
+ struct mutex q_lock;
+ struct list_head qs;
+};
At a quick glance, this problem really stood out to me. You CAN NOT
have two different objects within a structure that have different
lifetime rules and reference counts. You do that here with both a
'struct cdev' and a 'struct device'. Pick one or the other, but never
both.
I would recommend using a 'struct device' and then a 'struct cdev *'.
That way you get the advantage of using the driver model properly, and
then just adding your char device node pointer to "the side" which
interacts with this device.
Then you might want to call this "struct uacce_device" :)
I think I understand now.
'struct device' and then a 'struct cdev' have different refcounts.
Using 'struct cdev *', the release is not in uacce.c, but controlled by
cdev itself.
So uacce is decoupled with cdev.
//Using 'struct cdev *'
cdev_alloc->cdev_dynamic_release:kfree(p);
uacce_destroy_chrdev:
cdev_device_del->cdev_del(cdev)->kobject_put(&p->kobj);
if (refcount--) == 0
cdev_dynamic_release->kfree(p);
//Using 'struct device'
cdev_init->cdev_default_release
cdev is freed in uacce.c,
So 'struct device' and then a 'struct cdev' are bind together, while
cdev and uacce->dev have different refcount.
Thanks for the patience.
