Unsubscibe - Douglas Saylor 727-667-2497 Yahoo IM: ABSDoug On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Jacques Goldberg <goldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > By definition, an infinite number of pieces of code (with most of the code being irrelevant) can be invented in place of one double hit CTRL-C . > > > If what you wish to use are line commands, you can type ps ax | grep wvdial > > This will display one line showing the word wvdial (unless you have more than one instance of wvdial running, or none) the first parameter of which is the identification number of the process assigned to wvdial, such as for example 7531. Typing an additional command kill 7531 will then do exactly the same thing as CTRL-C > > > Of course, you will not like this solution because you have to read some output and then type it (or cut and paste with the mouse,...) > > So you can make it a bit more complicated.. > > Not to bore you, let us go straight for a command aptly named ctrl-c (arbitrary) > > You create a file named ctrl-c with the editor, gedit for example > > The contents could be: > > > #!/bin/bash > ps ax | grep wvdial | grep -v grep > junk; > read v1 v2 < junk; > kill $v1; > rm junk; > exit; > > > This assumes that you have no file of any value named junk in the folder where where you will place the file named ctrl-c > > You save the file for example in folder /usr/bin/local > > You make it executable by any user with the command > > sudo chmod a+x /usr/bin/local/ctrl-c > > > Then to stop wvdial you just need to open a new window or use an idle window but not the one where wvdial is running , and in there you type ctrl-c and wvdial will stop. Not ugly, like that way of holding both CTRL and C in one hit. > > > Finally, if what you wish is to stop wvdial as if you were a happy Windows user, that is, "just a click", you can use your display manager, probably Gnome or KDE but any will do, to create a new button, create or select some icon, and set it to be activated by command /usr/local/bin/ctrl-c > > Then, clicking the new button will nicely stop wvdial. > > > This link can provide for you an icon displaying the Ctrl key on a keyboard. Editing the image (with GIMP for example) you can superimpose the character C . > > > Real nirvana, right? > > > Jacques > > > > On 1/22/2010 11:54 PM, Ray Chandler wrote: > >> Great - thanks. 'sudo wvdial' works a treat. >> One more thing though - is there a command to hang up when I've finished, rather >> than just crudely pulling the modem usb plug out? >> >> Thanks, >> Ray >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Jeff Hunt<jeffhunt90@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: Ray Chandler<raychandler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, 22 October, 2010 22:21:22 >>> Subject: Re: pppd problem >>> >>> This is a common problem (bug?) in Ubuntu. A dialup user needs to be >>> in both the dip and dialout groups to get the necessary rights to use >>> the required files - there are at least two more files that will cause >>> problems once you get past pppd -. The files need to have the >>> appropriate group set to write. >>> Ask again if you don't know how to do this. >>> >>> An alternative is to run as root. Sudo wvdial. >>> >>> On 10/22/10, Ray Chandler<raychandler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> With help from linmodems.org and this discussion group (many thanks), I >> have >>>> got >>>> >>>> my Ubuntu 10.4 system talking to my Zoom 3095 usb modem, but after dialling >>>> and >>>> initial recognition, a ppp problem prevents completion of the ISP link. >>>> >>>> The wvdial log says "Unable to run /usr/sbin/pppd" (although pppd is >>>> definitely >>>> at that location), followed by "Check permissions or specify a PPPD Path >>>> option >>>> in wvdial.conf" >>>> >>>> Here's my wvdial.conf : >>>> >>>> [Dialer Defaults] >>>> Init1 = ATZ >>>> Init2 = ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0&C1&D2 +FCLASS=0 >>>> Modem Type = USB Modem >>>> ISDN = 0 >>>> New PPPD = yes >>>> Phone = 08456600924 >>>> Modem = /dev/ttyACM0 >>>> Username = (correct username shown) >>>> Carrier Check = no >>>> Password = (correct password shown) >>>> Baud = 460800 >>>> >>>> Do I need to make changes here, or elsewhere, to get things working? >>>> Thanks, Ray >>>> >
