Re: RV: Intel 537EP, openSuse 11.1, Kernel 2.6.29.1.1-pae. Driver fails to compile.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 04 October 2009 01:20:59 pm Jacques Goldberg wrote:

> Your harsh criticism is not the best way to express gratitude to a
> volunteer who has done a tremendous amount of work for a tremendous
> number of people since Intel has ceased its modem development and
> maintenance activities.
> 
There was no intent to express gratitude, simply an attempt to inform someone 
about the way it really is before they waste a lot of time.


> 
> 
> Please be a little more tolerant with somebody who not only gets no
> income but pays the hardware used to serve us.

You don't volunteer to maintain a package unless you are willing to do just 
that.  You certainly don't volunteer to maintain a package just so you can 
redirect anyone with a corporate email address to HP contract services to 
boost company revenue.  

The response I would have gotten, had I used a Gmail account would have been 
significantly different.  The central crux of the issue (which you and many 
others seem willing to overlook/miss) is that I was asked to fork over $3-$15K 
for support because I didn't bother to use a Gmail address like many others 
here on the list.  That was a severe breach of the "volunteer" quality/aspect 
you are touting.

> 
> As President of Logikal Solutions, you certainly make (part of) your
> living of selling your work, and have to pay the tools and salaries of
> your employees.
> 
I sell services on business quality platforms, not Unix and Linux.  I 
deliberately don't sell services on either of those platforms because _nobody_ 
pays for them.  RedHat is about out of business. Sun will be a memory before 
the end of 2011 (if not this year).  A good number of other Unix/Linux 
companies have already went out of business and their products have completely 
disappeared from the marketplace.  Whenever I do software work on a Linux 
platform I release it and never look back at it.

I don't go out and volunteer to support a package for a non-paying community 
in an effort to direct persons to a paying channel, which is what happened.

Had he simply said he would add it on the list and it would be a very long 
time before he got to it, I wouldn't have cared.  That wasn't said, or even 
hinted at.  Instead, a VOLUNTEER directed me to HP CONTRACT SERVICES to 
generate revenue from what they are supposedly volunteering to support.

The criticism isn't harsh, it was earned.

> 
> Have you considered offering him a job with your Company? He may be
> jobless, you know, in today's world.
> 
He is not unemployed.  He is currently using a VOLUNTEER position to direct 
users to HP CONTRACT SERVICES.

> Logikal Solutions might benefit from his very wide experience, and you
> might find yourself, personally, having become one of the many who
> support free Linux, not directly spending a cent on Linux development,
> just creating the conditions under which one of your employees would be
> happy giving some of his free time.
> 

Feel free to donate your free time to whatever pursuits you enjoy.  NEVER 
VOLUNTEER TO SUPPORT A PACKAGE THEN REDIRECT USERS TO CONTRACT SERVICES.  That 
is an unforgivable breach of ethics for which NO excuses can be made.

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593  (cell)
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.logikalsolutions.com

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux