May I kindly repeat for the last time my request that you run scanModem
and send us the resulting file ModemData.txt?
(http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/welcome.html#scanModem)
May I kindly ask again, for the last time, if you have Windows on your
computer and in that case, which speed it gives you?
Finally, may I kindly ask again, if you do not mind, to see the output
of an attempt to dial with wvdial, along with your file wvdial.conf
WHERE YOU SHOULD REMOVE OR MASK THE PASSWORD ?
(http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/wvdial.html)
Excuse me Nick_The_Great but you keep reporting a problem never (4 years
at least) seen before with one of the most widely used family of modems;
and you send us information which is useless for us as long as we do not
own the same modem, instead of what we humbly ask for in order to
convince ourselves that what you did was right.
Jacques
nick01 X wrote:
Ok, I updated to hsfmodem-7.60.00.09; it should definitely work now.
Are there any dependencies for V.90, V.92 that if missing could cause
this ? in kernel for example or somewhere else ?
On 5/29/07, nick01 X <nick01thegreat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<RX SIG PWR DB=0, TX SIG PWR DB=0, S/N RATIO DB=0>
I think that's the problem- it doesn't detect the signal to noise
ratio- it's listed as 0 so maybe that's why it refuses to use V.92 or
V.90. Anybody has a fix for this please ?
On 5/29/07, nick01 X <nick01thegreat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I now used Init2 = ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +MS=V90,0 which is supposed
> to force it to use V.90 but its still using V.34 :(
>
> On 5/29/07, nick01 X <nick01thegreat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I hope having a 2.4 ghz CPU can't reduce performance.
> >
> > On 5/29/07, Jacques Goldberg <Jacques.Goldberg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > And the speed of the CPU too may reduce performance.
> > >
> > > nick01 X wrote:
> > > > Maybe it also has some part that could use a firmware flash or
> > > > something ? :/
> > >
> >
>
