Caolán McNamara wrote:
I haven't any specific ideas, but I'd start with checking the (only) explicit use of cairo_version to see if toggling the conditional block of code protected by it on/off makes any difference.
That didn't help, unfortunately :-( And that code block is indeed the same in LO 24.2, so when using 1.18 with 24.2 it should have the same effect. What's so strange is that the same letter is rendered in different ways with 24.8+1.18 alhough the letters are all exactly at the same position of e.g. a calc cell compared to 24.8+1.16 or 24.2 (i.e. they don't take more space and therefore move etc.). So should this different rendering of same letters happen at all or is that where the problem starts? -- Dipl.-Inform. Frank Steiner Web: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/ Lehrstuhl f. Bioinformatik Mail: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/m/ LMU, Amalienstr. 17 Phone: +49 89 2180-4049 80333 Muenchen, Germany Fax: +49 89 2180-99-4049 * Rekursion kann man erst verstehen, wenn man Rekursion verstanden hat. *
