* Miklos Vajna (vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 03:26:42PM +0000, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What I'm thinking is that a cautious packager could set it up so > > that during the build qa/data wasn't readable, then having built and > > copied their installation out, then they could perform a make check > > having reenabled access to qa/data/ > > I wonder if this would be doable also at the current setup. Something > like search for all "data" directories under */qa/, delete them, do the > build, 'git checkout -f' to do undo the delete and then 'make check'? Yeh, I guess possible; I'm not sure what's easiest for packagers. (I was thinking along the lines of a permissions or blank directory mounted over it). Actually, a quick hunt for where we have docs shows they're a bit more spread around; e.g. ./sw/qa/core/exportdata/rtf/pass ./sc/qa/extras/testdocuments ./odk/examples/basic/sheet ./pyuno/qa/pytests/testdocuments so a simple find . -path .*qa/*/data isn't sufficient. Dave > > Regards, > > Miklos -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/