On 16 Aug 2023, at 16:23, Khaled Hosny <khaled@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16 Aug 2023, at 5:44 PM, Chris Tapp <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I’m supporting an organisation that is using LO to create pdfs that are used as inputs to a print-on-demand service, and we have identified a couple of issues that I would like to have a go at resolving:
1) The handling of font names differs between the Windows and MacOS builds, resulting in the rendering differing between the platforms;
I have some ideas to how to handle this, if you are still interested.
Regards, Khaled
Thanks.
I had tried looking to see if there were open bugs for these, but I hadn’t managed to find them.
Using the Open Sans Google Font, Font Book shows 12 styles:
- Regular
- Italic
- Light
- Light Italic
- Medium
- Medium Italic
- Semibold
- Semibold Italic
- Bold
- Bold Italic
- ExtraBold
- ExtraBold Italic
Within a local build (MacOS) of LO that includes your patch, I see the following Family / Typefaces:
- Open Sans / Regular, Bold, Italic, Bold Italic
- Open Sans Extra Bold / Regular, Italic
- Open Sans Light / Regular, Italic, Bold, Italic
- Open Sans Medium / Regular, Italic
- Open Sans Semibold / Regular, Italic
Within the latest release, all 12 styles are shown as Typefaces under the “Open Sans” family - which is consistent with the identifiers shown for each font in Font Book.
I am definitely interested in any ideas you have to handle this.
Chris
|