Hi Colomban, On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 03:09:51PM +0200, Colomban Wendling <cwendling@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bingo, hooking in there do give me the accessible tree I'm hoping for, as > with the Python UITest, thanks. Good, that's partial success. :-) > Unfortunately, I'm supposed to write in-process tests [1], so that wouldn't > really be an option. If really it's the only way I'd bring the discussion > and see if that requirement can be lifted, but then maybe I should just > switch to Python directly as it's probably more beginner-friendly as it's > one of the aims of the work I'm on. Anyway, for the moment that's not the > option I'm hoping for :) Sure, in-process tests are great if you can get them working, because they are simpler (more reliable) + it's much easier to debug if they fail. > > Most of our cppunit tests run in-process, using --headless, so if there > > would be any dialogs popping up, we would instantly cancel them. > > OK, that's an interesting info. However, I'm not anywhere close to dealing > with dialogs or even popups yet, all I'm after is the accessible objects > representing the menu items. This shouldn't require anything to actually > get displayed or pop up. > I guess however that maybe in headless mode the UI is in a degraded state; > would it be possible to trigger loading of the missing bits? Any idea where > to look? Hmm, so far you tried out of process + SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=svp and in-process + --headless. Try experimenting with the in-process + SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=svp combination, perhaps that would give you what you need. Be aware that in case of in-process tests your test code is running on the main thread, so if you depend on any idles, you need to manually spin the main loop with Scheduler::ProcessEventsToIdle() (vs out of process tests, where this is done for you automatically). Regards, Miklos